[1]高晓颖,郭全庆,王浩军,等.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2026.04.004螺栓电镀工艺有限元仿真及其工装设计[J].电镀与精饰,2026,(04):25-31.
　GAO Xiaoying,GUO Quanqing,WANG Haojun,et al.Finite element simulation and tooling design of bolt electroplating process[J].Plating & Finishing,2026,(04):25-31.
点击复制

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2026.04.004螺栓电镀工艺有限元仿真及其工装设计()

《电镀与精饰》[ISSN:1001-3849/CN:12-1096/TG]

卷:
期数:
2026年04
页码:
25-31
栏目:
出版日期:
2026-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Finite element simulation and tooling design of bolt electroplating process
作者:
高晓颖1; 郭全庆1; 王浩军1; 周雁文1; 张新宇1; 刘 飞2
(1. 中航西安飞机工业集团股份有限公司,陕西 西安 710089 ;2. 上海格麟倍科技发展有限公司,上海 201100)
Author(s):
GAO Xiaoying1;  GUO Quanqing1;  WANG Haojun1;  ZHOU Yanwen1;  ZHANG Xinyu1;  LIU Fei2
(1. AVIC Xian Aircraft Industry Group Co., Ltd., Xian 710089, China; 2. Shanghai Gelinbei Technology Development Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201100, China)
关键词:
电镀铬; 有限元仿真; 工装设计; 镀层厚度; 电流密度
Keywords:
electroplating chromium;  finite element simulation;  tooling design;  plating thickness;  current density
分类号:
TQ153.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
螺栓零件是飞机制造中非常重要的零件且产量巨大。为了解决螺栓零件在电镀铬后的镀层均匀性及同轴度差的问题，通过有限元仿真技术对螺栓零件电镀铬工艺进行仿真和辅助工装设计，研究了遮蔽环尺寸、每层零件数量和每层零件间距对螺栓镀铬镀层厚度分布的影响。仿真结果显示：对每层零件数量分别为8、12和16个进行电镀工艺仿真，单层零件个数的变化对螺栓零件表面镀层厚度分布影响很小，确定工装每层螺栓零件数量为16个。对内遮蔽宽度为30、50和70 mm进行仿真，随着内遮蔽宽度增加，单个螺栓零件镀层厚度分布变窄，确定内遮蔽宽度为70 mm。对不同零件层间距分别为150、200和250 mm进行仿真，随着零件层间距增加，单个螺栓零件镀层厚度分布变窄，确定内遮蔽宽度为250 mm。通过螺栓电镀铬实验，对比了实际电镀实验结果和电镀仿真结果，证实有限元电镀仿真结果可靠。
Abstract:
Bolt parts are very important components in aircraft manufacturing with massive production volumes. In order to solve the problems of coating uniformity and poor coaxiality of bolt parts after chrome plating, finite element simulation was used to simulate the chrome plating process of bolt parts and assist in fixture design. The influence of shielding ring size, number of parts per layer and spacing between parts per layer on the thickness distribution of chrome plating on bolts were studied. The simulation results show that for electroplating process simulations with 8, 12 and 16 parts per layer, the change in the number of single-layer parts has little effect on the distribution of coating thickness on the surface of bolt parts. Therefore, the number of bolt parts per layer of the fixture is determined to be 16. Simulations are conducted on the inner shielding widths of 30, 50 and 70 mm. As the inner shielding width increases, the distribution of coating thickness on a single bolt component becomes narrower, and the inner shielding width is determined to be 7 0?mm. Simulations are conducted on different component layer spacings of 150, 200 and 250 mm, and as the interlayer spacing increase s, the distribution of coating thickness on a single bolt component becomes narrower, and the inner shielding width is determined to be 250 mm. Through bolt electroplating chromium experiments, the actual electroplating experiment results are compared with the electroplating simulation results, and it is concluded that the finite element electroplating simulation results are reliable.

参考文献/References:

[1].王晓荷, 曹增强, 张铭豪, 等. 不同铆枪干涉螺栓安装效率及噪音对比研究[J]. 塑料工程学报, 2022, 29(9): 127-134.
[2].姜杰凤, 董辉跃, 毕运波. 高锁螺栓干涉配合安装工艺参数对凸瘤的影响分析[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(4): 936-945.
[3].孟保利, 高晓颖, 郑超, 等. 多次电镀铬对30CrMnSiNi2A疲劳寿命和氢脆性能的影响[J]. 电镀与精饰, 2023, 5(45): 65-70.
[4].郝江华, 高晓颖, 王浩军, 等. 不同钢铁表面无氰镀镉钛和氰化镀镉钛镀层性能差异[J]. 电镀与精饰, 2024, 4(45): 59-65.
[5].郭志刚. 影响零件电镀质量的外部因素[J]. 电镀与精饰, 1995, 17(2): 26-27.
[6].柳玉波. 表面处理工艺大全[M]. 北京: 中国计量出版社, 1996: 139-142.
[7].张允诚, 胡如南, 向荣. 电镀手册[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1997: 1011-1012.
[8].王浩军, 高晓颖, 周雁文, 等. 基于有限元计算的滑轨电镀工装设计与优化[J]. 电镀与精饰, 2025, 47(5): 45-52.
[9].高晓颖, 王浩军, 史建猛, 等. 基于有限元仿真的滑杆零件电镀金工装设计与试验验证[J]. 电镀与涂饰, 2025, 44(2): 36-42.
[10].MAHAPATRO A, SUGGU S K. Modeling and simulation of electrodeposition: effect of electrolyte current density and conductivity on electroplating thickness[J]. Advanced Materials Science, 2018, 3 (2): 143-151.
[11].MOHAMMED S D, DESAI H. Basic concepts of finite element analysis and its applications in dentistry: an overview[J]. Journal of Oral Hygiene & Health, 2014, 2(5): 1000156.
[12].LEE K, FISHWICK P A. Building a model for real-time simulation[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2001, 17(5): 585-600.
[13].DECONINCK J, MAGGETTO G, VEREECKEN J. Calculation of current distribution and electrode shape change by the boundary element method[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1985, 132(12): 2960-2965.
[14].彭聪, 罗晗, 骆祎岚, 等. 基于有限元模拟的电镀夹具优化[J]. 电镀与涂饰, 2022, 41(15): 1053-1058.
[15].DICKINSON E J F, EKSTROM H, FONTES E. COMSOL Multiphysics?: finite element software for electrochemical analysis. A mini-review[J]. Electrochemistry Communications, 2014, 40: 71-74.
[16].WATANABE H, HAYASHI S, HONMA H, et al. Microbump formation by noncyanide gold electroplating[J]. Journal of the Electrochemistry Society, 1999, 146(2): 574.
[17].SATO J, KATO M, OTANI H, et al. [J]. Journal of the Electrochemistry Society, 2002, 149: C168.
[18].吴蒙华, 刘新功, 王元刚, 等. 基于电磁场与流场耦合的电沉积加工过程仿真[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2013, 23(1): 219-228.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨 堃*,张 明,孙小岚.TC2、TC6表面喷涂WC-17Co与电镀铬耐磨性能对比[J].电镀与精饰,2021,(10):26.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2021.10.005]
　YANG Kun*,ZHANG Ming,SUN Xiaolan.Wear Resistant Comparison of Spraying WC-17Co Coating and Chromium Plating on the Surface of TC2 and TC6[J].Plating & Finishing,2021,(04):26.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2021.10.005]
[2]刘 燕*,李文生,修文波,等.基于有限元仿真方法的镀银层厚度均匀性研究[J].电镀与精饰,2021,(11):36.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2021.11.007]
　LIU Yan*,LI Wensheng,XIU Wenbo,et al.Research on Thickness Uniformity of Silver Coating Based on Finite Element Simulation[J].Plating & Finishing,2021,(04):36.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2021.11.007]
[3]郭敏智,谢焕钧,李立群.镀前处理对GH4169电镀铬的影响[J].电镀与精饰,2022,(6):7.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2022.06.002]
　GUO Minzhi,XIE Huanjun,LI Liqun.Effect of Pretreatment on Chromium Electroplating of GH4169[J].Plating & Finishing,2022,(04):7.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2022.06.002]
[4]孟保利,高晓颖*,郑 超,等.多次电镀铬对30CrMnSiNi2A疲劳寿命和氢脆性能的影响[J].电镀与精饰,2023,(5):65.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2023.05.009]
　Meng Baoli,Gao Xiaoying*,Zheng Chao,et al.Influence of repeated chromium plating on fatigue life and hydrogen embrittlement performance of 30CrMnSiNi2A[J].Plating & Finishing,2023,(04):65.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2023.05.009]
[5]吴 畏*,陈腊梅,张丹丹,等. 镁锂合金微弧氧化的研究进展[J].电镀与精饰,2023,(5):71.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2023.05.010]
　Wu Wei*,Chen Lamei,Zhang Dandan,et al.Influence of repeated chromium plating on fatigue life and hydrogen embrittlement performance of 30CrMnSiNi2A[J].Plating & Finishing,2023,(04):71.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2023.05.010]
[6]汪 祥,靳 磊,等.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2025.08.007钢质零件三价铬与传统六价铬电镀对比研究[J].电镀与精饰,2025,(08):41.
　Wang Xiang,Jin Lei,*,et al.Comparative study of trivalent chromium and traditional hexavalent chromium electroplating for steel parts[J].Plating & Finishing,2025,(04):41.
[7]纪 翔,彭子辰,鲁文婷.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2026.04.005复合材料基体激光除漆有限元仿真工艺分析[J].电镀与精饰,2026,(04):32.
　JI Xiang,PENG Zichen,LU Wenting.Process analysis of finite element simulation for laser paint removal of composite matrix[J].Plating & Finishing,2026,(04):32.
[8]王浩军,高晓颖*,周雁文,等.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2025.05.007基于有限元计算的滑轨电镀工装设计与优化[J].电镀与精饰,2025,(05):45.
　Wang Haojun,Gao Xiaoying *,Zhou Yanwen,et al.Design and optimization of sliding rail electroplating tooling based on finite element calculation[J].Plating & Finishing,2025,(04):45.

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-04-15