[1]王浩军,高晓颖*,周雁文,等.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2025.05.007基于有限元计算的滑轨电镀工装设计与优化[J].电镀与精饰,2025,(05):45-52.
　Wang Haojun,Gao Xiaoying *,Zhou Yanwen,et al.Design and optimization of sliding rail electroplating tooling based on finite element calculation[J].Plating & Finishing,2025,(05):45-52.
点击复制

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2025.05.007基于有限元计算的滑轨电镀工装设计与优化()

《电镀与精饰》[ISSN:1001-3849/CN:12-1096/TG]

卷:
期数:
2025年05
页码:
45-52
栏目:
出版日期:
2025-05-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Design and optimization of sliding rail electroplating tooling based on finite element calculation
作者:
王浩军1; 高晓颖1*; 周雁文1; 郭 旋1; 杨慧智1; 刘 飞2
(1. 中航西安飞机工业集团股份有限公司,陕西 西安 710089 ;2. 上海格麟倍科技发展有限公司,上海 201100)
Author(s):
Wang Haojun 1;  Gao Xiaoying 1*;  Zhou Yanwen 1;  Guo Xuan 1;  Yang Huizhi 1;  Liu Fei 2
(1. AVIC Xian Aircraft Industry Group Co., Ltd.Xian 710089, China 2. Shanghai Gelinbei Technology Development Co., Ltd Shanghai 201100China)
关键词:
电镀铬; 辅助阳极; 辅助阴极; 有限元仿真; 镀层厚度
Keywords:
electroplating chromium;  auxiliary anode;  auxiliary cathode;  finite element simulation;  plating thickness
分类号:
TQ153.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了解决滑轨零件不同，导动面电镀铬镀层厚度不均匀的问题，通过Plating Manager有限元仿真软件对滑轨电镀工艺进行仿真。研究了辅助阳极和辅助阴极的尺寸、摆放位置和距离待镀面的距离对滑轨镀铬面镀层厚度分布的影响。仿真结果显示：电流密度和镀层厚度均随着辅助阳极和待镀面距离的减小而增加，最后确定大导动面阳极宽度为140 mm，大导动面阳极距离待镀面距离为50 mm；大导动面背部辅助阳极距离对待镀面电流密度和镀层厚度影响较小，辅助阳极距离待镀面距离为5 mm；辅助阴极直径对棱边电流分布和镀层厚度分布的影响很大，而辅助阴极到棱边的距离对棱边电流分布和镀层厚度的影响较小，最终确定辅助阴极直径为5 mm，辅助阴极到棱边的距离为20 mm；通过滑轨电镀铬实验，对比了实际电镀实验结果和电镀仿真结果，表明有限元电镀仿真结果可靠。
Abstract:
In order to solve the problem of uneven thickness of chrome plating on different guide surfaces of slide rail parts, the plating process of slide rail was simulated using the Plating Manager finite element simulation software. The influence of the size, placement position, and distance of auxiliary anode and auxiliary cathode from the surface to be plated on the distribution of chrome plating thickness on the slide rail was studied. The simulation results show that the current density and coating thickness both increase as the distance between the auxiliary anode and the surface to be coated decreases. Finally, the width of the anode on the large guide surface is determined to be 140 mm, and the distance between the anode on the large guide surface and the surface to be plated is determined to be 50 mm; The distance between the auxiliary anode on the back of the large guide surface has little effect on the current density and coating thickness of the surface to be plated, and the distance between the auxiliary anode and the surface to be plated is 5 mm; The diameter of the auxiliary cathode has a significant impact on the edge current distribution and coating thickness distribution, while the distance from the auxiliary cathode to the edge has a relatively small impact on the edge current distribution and coating thickness. Ultimately, the diameter of the auxiliary cathode was determined to be 5 mm, and the distance from the auxiliary cathode to the edge is 20 mm; By conducting chromium plating experiments on sliding rails, the actual plating experiment results were compared with the plating simulation results, and it is concluded that the finite element plating simulation results are reliable

参考文献/References:

[1].吴辉煌. 应用电化学基础[M]. 厦门: 厦门大学出版社, 2006: 88-95.
[2].刘鹏, 蔡健平, 王旭东, 等. 飞机起落架材料防护技术现状及研究进展[J]. 装备环境工程, 2011, 8(2): 81-84.
[3].郭志刚. 影响零件电镀质量的外部因素[J]. 电镀与精饰, 1995, 17(2): 26-27.
[4].柳玉波. 表面处理工艺大全[M]. 北京: 中国计量出版社, 1996: 139-142.
[5].宋子豪, 孙伦业, 王健, 等. 基于多场耦合的电解加工腐蚀模拟[J]. 机械研究与应用, 2021, 34(2): 65-68.
[6].Mahapatro A, Suggu S K. Modeling and simulation of electrodeposition: effect of electrolyte current density and conductivity on electroplating thickness [J]. Advanced Materials Science, 2018, 3 (2): 143-151.
[7].张允诚, 胡如南, 向荣. 电镀手册[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1997: 1011-1012.
[8].程海雨, 王超, 董恩吉, 等. 基于有限元仿真的实验用铜电解槽结构改进策略分析[J]. 河北水利电力学院学报, 2021, 31(3): 1-6.
[9].Lee K, Fishwick P A. Building a model for real-time simulation [J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2001, 17 (5): 585-600.
[10].Deconinck J, Maggetto G, Vereecken J. Calculation of current distribution and electrode shape change by the boundary element method [J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1985, 132 (12): 2960-2965.
[11].彭聪, 罗晗, 骆祎岚, 等. 基于有限元模拟的电镀夹具优化[J]. 电镀与涂饰, 2022, 41(15): 1053-1058.
[12].Dickinson E J F, Ekstrom H, Fontes E. Comsol multiphysics: finite element software for electrochemical analysis. A mini-review [J]. Electrochemistry Communications, 2014, 40: 71-74.
[13].Watanabe H, Hayashi S, Honma H, et al. Effect of thiourea, benzotriazole and 4,5-dithiaoctane-1,8- disulphonic acid on the kinetics of copper deposition from dilute acid sulphate solutions[J]. Journal of the Electrochemistry Society, 1999, 146(2): 574-583.
[14].Sato J, Kato M, Otani H, et al. Energy storage in composites of a redox couple host and a lithium ion host[J]. Journal of the Electrochemistry Society, 2002, 149: 168-190.
[15].吴蒙华, 刘新功, 王元刚, 等. 基于电磁场与流场耦合的电沉积加工过程仿真[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2013, 23 (1): 219-228.
[16].Bard A J, Faulkner L R. 电化学方法原理和应用[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2005: 67.
[17].金晶. 立式连续电镀槽中镀层均匀性的改善作用研究及多物理场耦合分析[D]. 上海:上海交通大学, 2013.
[18].李荻. 电化学原理[M]. 北京: 北京航空航天大学出版社, 2008: 77-82.
[19].李杰, 余亚东, 薛亚许, 等. 配电开关梅花触头接触部位镀银导电性的仿真分析和实验研究[J]. 电镀与涂饰, 2023, 42 (11): 7-15.
[20].孙伟, 张淑婷, 杜开平, 等. 汽油机活塞顶层镀层的设计与仿真研究[J]. 电镀与精饰, 2023, 45(2): 79-85.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨 堃*,张 明,孙小岚.TC2、TC6表面喷涂WC-17Co与电镀铬耐磨性能对比[J].电镀与精饰,2021,(10):26.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2021.10.005]
　YANG Kun*,ZHANG Ming,SUN Xiaolan.Wear Resistant Comparison of Spraying WC-17Co Coating and Chromium Plating on the Surface of TC2 and TC6[J].Plating & Finishing,2021,(05):26.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2021.10.005]
[2]孟保利,高晓颖*,郑 超,等.多次电镀铬对30CrMnSiNi2A疲劳寿命和氢脆性能的影响[J].电镀与精饰,2023,(5):65.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2023.05.009]
　Meng Baoli,Gao Xiaoying*,Zheng Chao,et al.Influence of repeated chromium plating on fatigue life and hydrogen embrittlement performance of 30CrMnSiNi2A[J].Plating & Finishing,2023,(05):65.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2023.05.009]
[3]吴 畏*,陈腊梅,张丹丹,等. 镁锂合金微弧氧化的研究进展[J].电镀与精饰,2023,(5):71.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2023.05.010]
　Wu Wei*,Chen Lamei,Zhang Dandan,et al.Influence of repeated chromium plating on fatigue life and hydrogen embrittlement performance of 30CrMnSiNi2A[J].Plating & Finishing,2023,(05):71.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2023.05.010]
[4]汪 祥,靳 磊,等.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2025.08.007钢质零件三价铬与传统六价铬电镀对比研究[J].电镀与精饰,2025,(08):41.
　Wang Xiang,Jin Lei,*,et al.Comparative study of trivalent chromium and traditional hexavalent chromium electroplating for steel parts[J].Plating & Finishing,2025,(05):41.
[5]高晓颖,郭全庆,王浩军,等.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2026.04.004螺栓电镀工艺有限元仿真及其工装设计[J].电镀与精饰,2026,(04):25.
　GAO Xiaoying,GUO Quanqing,WANG Haojun,et al.Finite element simulation and tooling design of bolt electroplating process[J].Plating & Finishing,2026,(05):25.
[6]吴 畏.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2026.05.005一种镍铝青铜合金表面镀硬铬工艺[J].电镀与精饰,2026,(05):34.
　WU Wei.A plating process of hard chromium on Ni-Al bronze alloy surface[J].Plating & Finishing,2026,(05):34.
[7]郭敏智,谢焕钧,李立群.镀前处理对GH4169电镀铬的影响[J].电镀与精饰,2022,(6):7.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2022.06.002]
　GUO Minzhi,XIE Huanjun,LI Liqun.Effect of Pretreatment on Chromium Electroplating of GH4169[J].Plating & Finishing,2022,(05):7.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2022.06.002]

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-05-19