[1]杨维宇,刘 妍,刘恩泽,等.影响冷轧板表面转化膜形成质量因素研究[J].电镀与精饰,2024,(9):76-82.[doi:doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2024.09.011]
　Yang Weiyu*,Liu Yan,Liu Enze,et al.Analysis of factors influencing the quality of surface conversion film formation on cold rolled sheet[J].Plating & Finishing,2024,(9):76-82.[doi:doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2024.09.011]
点击复制

影响冷轧板表面转化膜形成质量因素研究()

《电镀与精饰》[ISSN:1001-3849/CN:12-1096/TG]

卷:
期数:
2024年9
页码:
76-82
栏目:
出版日期:
2024-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of factors influencing the quality of surface conversion film formation on cold rolled sheet
作者:
(内蒙古包钢钢联股份有限公司技术中心,内蒙古 包头 014010)
Author(s):
Yang Weiyu*;  Liu Yan;  Liu Enze;  Wang Yanan;  Gu Xin
(Technical Center, Inner Mongolia Baotou Steel Union Co., Ltd., Baotou 014010, China)
关键词:
冷轧板; 磷化膜; 硅烷膜; 表面质量; 表面微观形貌
Keywords:
cold-rolled sheet;  phosphating film;  silane film;  surface qualities;  surface micro morphology
分类号:
TG178
DOI:
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2024.09.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
磷化膜、硅烷膜是冷轧板常见的转化膜，除自身工艺对其形成质量有很大的影响外，冷轧板表面状态及形貌对其形成质量也有很大的影响。研究了冷轧板表面残油、残碳，表面夹杂物及析出相，表面缺陷，表面合金元素偏聚，表面微观形貌表征参数等对转化膜形成质量的影响，并就转化膜对电泳漆膜耐腐蚀性能的影响及未来研究方向进行了讨论。结果表明：冷轧板表面的洁净化，表面夹杂物及析出相、偏聚元素、划痕缺陷控制的少量化，表面微观形貌表征参数控制的精细化，可以提高冷轧板转化膜的形成质量。
Abstract:
Phosphating film and silane film are common conversion films on cold-rolled sheet. In addition to their own process having a significant impact on their formation quality, surface state and morphology of cold-rolled sheet also have a significant impact on their formation quality.The effects of residual oil and carbon on the surface of cold-rolled sheet, surface inclusions and precipitates, surface defects, surface alloying element segregation, surface micro morphology characterization parameters on the qualities of conversion film formation were analyzed ，the influence of conversion film on the corrosion resistance of electrophoretic paint film and future research directions were discussed. The results indicate that：the cleanliness and purification of the surface of cold-rolled sheet, the reduction of surface inclusions and precipitates, segregation elements, and scratch defects, and the meticulous of surface micro morphology characterization parameters can improve the qualities of the formation of the conversion film on cold-rolled sheet.

参考文献/References:

[1].高子茹, 文宇佳, 易生平, 等. 金属表面硅烷前处理技术的研究进展[J].有机硅材料, 2018 ,32 (增刊): 98-102.
[2].李文超,张明明,乔静飞,等.冷轧钢表面磷化膜和硅烷膜的制备与性能[J].腐蚀与防护,2015,35(4):334-337.
[3].孙曙元,徐杰,王振东,等.工程机械结构件前处理对硅烷成膜的影响[J].涂料工业,2015,45(9):32-38.
[4].齐建群,孟凡月,王浩宇,等.连退板表面缺陷对磷化质量的影响[J].河南冶金,2021,29(4):8-11.
[5].王瑾,赵小龙,潘红涛,等.家电用普冷板材表面状态对磷化效果的影响[J].轧钢, 2016, 33(1): 33-36.
[6].杨成志,董蓓,彭周,等.表面缺陷对预磷化电镀锌板磷化膜质量的影响[J].材料保护,2018(2):9-13.
[7].王金荣,柳桂琦,逯志强,等.硅烷处理对热镀锌钢表面涂层结合力的影响[J].电镀与涂饰,2020,39(15): 996-999.
[8].生海,杨建炜,曹建平,等.冷轧IF钢板表面状态对磷化膜质量的影响[J].腐蚀与防护,2016,37 (12): 966-969, 998.
[9].何建锋.冷轧板表面凹坑缺陷对磷化的影响[J].中国冶金,2014,24(增刊):340-344.
[10].张晓磊,杨维宇,刘妍,等.划痕对冷轧汽车钢板DC04磷化膜质量的影响[J].包钢科技, 2022, 48(4):37-40.
[11].陈义庆,徐小连,李天统,等.表面状态对冷轧家电板磷化效果的影响[J].鞍钢技术,2008,354(6):21-24.
[12].孟凡月,张杰,张静,等.钢板表面元素富集对硅烷处理后电泳漆膜耐蚀性的影响[J].电镀与涂饰,2022, 41 (16): 1181-1184.
[13].陈义庆,徐小连,李天统,等.冷轧家电板磷化后耐蚀性能的影响因素[J]. 腐蚀科学与防护技术,2010, 22(1):61-63.
[14].陈义庆,徐小连,李天统,等.表面粗糙度对冷轧钢板磷化质量的影响[J].腐蚀与防护, 2011,32(9):697-700.
[15].任彬彬.冷轧汽车板磷化膜品质的评价方法研究[J].中国涂料,2018,33(1):66-69.
[16].高立军,杨建炜,章军,等.表面粗糙度对冷轧汽车板磷化膜耐腐蚀性能的影响[J].四川冶金, 2015, 37(5): 32-35,45.
[17].胡燕慧,张浩,滕华湘,等.Ra及Rpc对无铬耐指纹热镀锌板表面性能的影响[J].表面技术,2015, 44(9): 147- 152.
[18].郝玉林,生海,黎敏.冷轧钢板表面质量对锆化膜性能的影响[J].涂料工业,2019,49(3):67-74.
[19].杨维宇,刘妍,张晓磊,等.激光共聚焦显微镜在DC04表面形貌表征中的应用[J].物理测试, 2023, 41(2): 21-25.
[20].颜晨曦,郝玉林,蔡宁,等.酸洗汽车用钢磷化机理探讨及其质量评价[J].电镀与精饰,2022,44(11):29-34.
[21].郭俊营,刘自妥,熊猛,等.镀锌钢板涂刷磷化、皂化处理的研究及展望[J].电镀与精饰,2022,44(11):69-75.
[22].张青树,齐韦.冷轧带钢表面形貌测试及其粗糙度均匀性控制研究[J].轧钢,2022,39(5):103-107.
[23].井玉安,臧晓明,商秋月,等.还原冷轧过程中带钢表面形貌演变规律[J].钢铁,2014,49(12):338-43.
[24].张佳康,周晓敏,蒋靖.冷轧带钢表面微观形貌轧制转印规律分析[J].金属世界,2018,(3):34-39.
[25].许斌,刘春明,安成强,等.冷轧板的各工序形貌及表面清洁度分析[J].表面技术,2010,39(4):53-54,112.
[26].刘颖,王修春,江荣岩.金属表面改性硅烷化处理研究进展[J].山东化工,2021,50(3):70-76.
[27].曹献龙,邓洪达,余大亮,等. 钢铁表面锆基复合转化膜的研究进展[J].电镀与涂饰,2019,38(13):697-703.
[28].黎敏,姜发同,袁超,等.前处理工艺对镀锌板电泳漆膜抗石击腐蚀性能的影响[J].电镀与涂饰, 2021, 40(12): 915-920.
[29].顾宏,张文兴.硅烷薄膜前处理车身面漆附着力问题的分析与解决[J].电镀与涂饰, 2023, 42 (16): 49-53.

相似文献/References:

[1]张伟华?,孙 伟,安丽洁,等.不同磷化工艺对建筑用16Mn钢的磷化效果研究[J].电镀与精饰,2020,(12):5.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2020.12.0020]
　ZHANG Weihua,SUN Wei,AN Lijie,et al.Study on Phosphating Effect of Different Phosphating Process on 16Mn Steel for Construction[J].Plating & Finishing,2020,(9):5.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2020.12.0020]
[2]陈亚军*,孙利成,王汉森,等.循环盐雾中两种聚氨酯涂层冷轧板腐蚀行为[J].电镀与精饰,2022,(1):11.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2022.01.003]
　CHEN Yajun* SUN Licheng WANG Hansen REN Kaixu SONG Xiaoxiao WANG Xin.Corrosion Behavior of Two Kinds of Polyurethane Coated Cold Colled Plates in Cyclic Salt Spray Test[J].Plating & Finishing,2022,(9):11.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2022.01.003]
[3]左亚静.土建工程支架用螺纹钢表面处理及耐腐蚀性能研究[J].电镀与精饰,2022,(9):71.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2022.09.013]
　ZUO Yajing.Study on Surface Treatment and Corrosion Resistance of Rebar Used for Supports in Civil Engineering[J].Plating & Finishing,2022,(9):71.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2022.09.013]
[4]周艳丽.电器件支架低温锌系磷化工艺研究[J].电镀与精饰,2021,(4):20.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2021.04.005]
　ZHOU Yanli.Research on Low-temperature Zinc Phosphating Process of Electrical Parts Support[J].Plating & Finishing,2021,(9):20.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2021.04.005]
[5]李俊辉*,杨国华,宋铁创,等.钢制电缆桥架防腐蚀试验研究[J].电镀与精饰,2021,(5):49.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2021.05.008]
　LI Junhui*,YANG Guohua,SONG Tiechuang,et al.Anti-Corrosion Study of Steel Cable Bridge[J].Plating & Finishing,2021,(9):49.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2021.05.008]
[6]牟世辉*,李鑫宇.恒电流作用下AZ91D镁合金磷化膜生长研究[J].电镀与精饰,2021,(9):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2021.09.001]
　MU Shihui*,LI Xinyu.Growth of Phosphating Film on AZ91D Magnesium Alloy Under Constant Current[J].Plating & Finishing,2021,(9):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2021.09.001]
[7]李继伟*,杨振宇,翟欢乐.钢结构连接螺栓锰系磷化及磷化膜的耐蚀性[J].电镀与精饰,2022,(1):50.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2022.01.009]
　LI Jiwei*,YANG Zhenyu,ZHAI Huanle.Manganese Phosphating of Steel Structure Connecting Bolt and Corrosion Resistance of Phosphating Film[J].Plating & Finishing,2022,(9):50.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2022.01.009]
[8]蔡 宁*,姚士聪,龙 袁,等. 磷化膜白斑缺陷分析 [J].电镀与精饰,2022,(10):92.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2022.10.016]
　CAI Ning*,AO Shicong,LONG Yuan,et al.Analysis of White Spot Defect on Phosphating Films[J].Plating & Finishing,2022,(9):92.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2022.10.016]
[9]颜晨曦 *,郝玉林,蔡 宁,等.酸洗汽车用钢磷化机理探讨及其质量评价[J].电镀与精饰,2022,(11):29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2022.11.006]
　YAN Chenxi *,HAO Yulin,CAI Ning,et al.Discussion on Phosphating Mechanism and Quality Evaluation of Pickling Automobile Steel[J].Plating & Finishing,2022,(9):29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2022.11.006]
[10]吕 芳,谷 娜*.化工管道连接法兰磷化工艺条件优化及磷化膜的耐蚀性[J].电镀与精饰,2022,(3):59.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2022.03.011]
　LYU Fang,GU Na *.Optimization of Phosphating Process Conditions for Chemical Pipe Connection Flange and Corrosion Resistance of Phosphating Film[J].Plating & Finishing,2022,(9):59.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2022.03.011]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
4 结 论
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-09-11