[1]王建邦.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2026.06.010钛合金表面减摩耐磨复合膜层构筑及其结合强度增强机制[J].电镀与精饰,2026,(06):79-88.
 WANG Jianbang.Construction of anti-friction and wear-resistant composite film layers on titanium alloy surfaces and its mechanism for enhancing bonding strength[J].Plating & Finishing,2026,(06):79-88.
点击复制

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2026.06.010钛合金表面减摩耐磨复合膜层构筑及其结合强度增强机制()

《电镀与精饰》[ISSN:1001-3849/CN:12-1096/TG]

卷:
期数:
2026年06
页码:
79-88
栏目:
出版日期:
2026-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Construction of anti-friction and wear-resistant composite film layers on titanium alloy surfaces and its mechanism for enhancing bonding strength
作者:
王建邦
(廊坊职业技术学院 汽车工程系,河北 廊坊 06500 1)
Author(s):
WANG Jianbang
(Department of Automotive Engineering, Langfang Polytechnic Institute, Langfang 06500 1, China)
关键词:
钛合金复合膜层减摩耐磨汽车部件
Keywords:
titanium alloy composite film antifriction and wear resistance automobile components
分类号:
TQ150 TG174.4
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为增强钛合金耐磨性及结合强度,研究将微弧氧化(MAO)与复合电镀技术联用。经打磨、清洗、酸碱活化预处理的Ti-6Al-4?V合金基体,在硅酸盐电解液中微弧氧化形成多孔粗糙底层。然后以该底层为阴极,在含不同SiC含量镀液中复合电镀,通过调控电流密度与SiC含量,制备出MAO-Ni-SiC复合膜层,并设置无Ni中间层的MAO-SiC对照组,系统探究各因素对膜层性能的影响。结果表明,随着电流密度增大,Ni相结晶度和沉积量增加,SiC嵌入量提升,当电流密度为10 A?dm–2时,SiC相对含量达40%;SiC含量增至20 g/L时,其相对含量达50%,但Ni相含量因沉积受阻略有下降。在摩擦性能方面,6 A?dm–2电流密度和15 g/L SiC含量时综合表现最优,5 N载荷下平均摩擦系数低至0.39,20 N载荷下磨损率较对照组降低40%~56%。结合强度测试显示,10 A?dm–2时临界载荷Lc2达23.5 N,较最低电流密度组提升85%,且SiC含量15 g/L时划格评级为1级(无脱落)。最优工艺参数为电流密度6 A?dm–2、SiC含量15 g/L,此时膜层致密性与颗粒嵌入量平衡,减摩耐磨性能与结合强度最佳。结合强度增强机制中,MAO底层多孔结构机械锚固贡献40%,Ni基质的机械锚固、冶金结合及内聚强度贡献合计70%,SiC颗粒嵌入贡献35%,三者协同强化界面与内部结构。研究所得的复合膜层通过多相协同显著提升钛合金的减摩耐磨性能与界面结合强度,有助于延长汽车零部件服役寿命。
Abstract:
To enhance the wear resistance and bonding strength of titanium alloys, the combination of Micro-arc oxidation (MAO) and composite electroplating technology was studied. The Ti-6Al-4?V alloy matrix, which has undergone pretreatment such as grinding, cleaning and acid-base activation, is subjected to micro-arc oxidation in silicate electrolyte to form a porous and rough bottom layer. Then, using this bottom layer as the cathode, composite electroplating was carried out in plating solutions with different SiC contents. By regulating the current density and SiC content, MAO-Ni- SiC composite film layers were prepared, and a MAO- SiC control group without a Ni intermediate layer was set up to systematically explore the influence of various factors on the performance of the film layers. The results show that with the increase of current density, the crystallinity and deposition amount of the Ni phase increase, and the SiC embedding amount increases. When the current density is 10 A?dm–2, the relative content of SiC reaches 40%. When the content of SiC increased to 20 g/L, its relative content reached 50%, but the content of the Ni phase slightly decreased due to deposition obstruction. In terms of friction performance, the comprehensive performance is the best at A current density of 6 A?dm–2 and a SiC content of 15 g/L. The average friction coefficient is as low as 0.39 under a 5 N load, and the wear rate under a 20 N load is 40% to 56% lower than that of the control group. The combined strength test shows that at 10 A?dm–2, the critical load Lc2 reaches 23.5 N, which is 85% higher than that of the lowest current density group, and when the SiC content is 15 g/L, the division rating is grade 1 (no detachment). The optimal process parameters are A current density of 6 A?dm–2 and a SiC content of 15 g/L. At this time, the film layer density is balanced with the particle embedding amount, and the anti-friction, wear resistance performance and bonding strength are the best. In the mechanism of enhancing bonding strength, the mechanical anchoring of the porous structure at the bottom layer of MAO contributes 40%, the mechanical anchoring, metallurgical bonding and cohesive strength of the Ni matrix contribute a combined 70%, and the embedding of SiC particles contributes 35%. The three work together to strengthen the interface and internal structure. The composite film layer constructed by the research institute significantly enhances the anti-friction, wear-resistant performance and interfacial bonding strength of titanium alloys through multiphase synergy, which is conducive to extending the service life of automotive parts.

参考文献/References:

[1].徐世伟, 纪志康, 肖培杰, 等. 汽车轻量化技术研究现状及展望[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(1): 16-31.
[2].王文, 陈文刚, 王海军, 等. 汽车轻量化气门材料减摩改性的研究进展[J]. 热加工工艺, 2024, 53(23): 1-6.
[3].刘怡然, 李磊. 喷丸强化对选区激光熔化TC4钛合金表面力学性能的影响[J]. 粉末冶金技术, 2025, 43(3): 367-376.
[4].ZHU Y, SONG L, DENG Z, et al. Study of the friction and wear behavior of Ti-6Al-4?V alloy under low temperatures[J]. Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 2025, 77(3): 1659-1670.
[5].杨众, 于美, 张欣然, 等. 钛合金前处理后时间对其表面溶胶凝胶成膜行为及膜层性能的影响[J]. 表面技术, 2025, 54(10): 141-150.
[6].KUMAR R, SHARMA A, PANDEY K G R K. Vacuum sealing-assisted processing of titanium-zirconium alloys: Synthesis, microstructure, hardness, friction, wear and corrosion studies for biomedical application[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2024, 59(17): 7409-7427.
[7].李德, 张立华, 文康, 等. KOH/K2ZrF6对TC4钛合金微弧氧化膜层形貌和结合强度的影响[J]. 材料科学与工艺, 2021, 29(1): 30-37.
[8].祝存款, 张明远, 王守仁, 等. 微弧氧化对Ti6Al4?V钛合金在高温域(300℃)下的微动磨损行为影响研究[J]. 材料保护, 2025, 58(7): 75-84.
[9].牛朝泽, 谷书华, 余谷峰, 等. 铜集流体在负极体系中的电化学行为[J]. 电池, 2025, 55(3): 522-528.
[10].WANG X, WANG P, DUAN Y, et al. Study on the effect of LuCl3 doping on the characteristics of titanium alloy micro-arc oxidation coatings[J]. International Journal of Materials Research, 2024, 115(8): 674-684.
[11].田雅琴, 刘文涛, 胡梦辉, 等. 镍-二氧化钛复合镀层的制备及耐腐蚀性研究[J]. 功能材料, 2023, 54(10): 10224-10230.
[12].马冬威, 谭永星, 邹翔, 等. 工艺参数对Q235钢板锌系磷化膜微观形貌和耐蚀性的影响[J]. 电镀与精饰, 2025, 47(5): 24-29.
[13].李建普, 卢旭东, 李冬冬. 舰用钛合金及铬涂层抗氧化和腐蚀性能研究[J]. 电镀与精饰, 2024, 46(5): 72-76.
[14].杨超, 代燕, 石桦荥, 等. TLM钛合金表层TiN/Sn复合涂层的制备及磨损行为研究[J]. 材料保护, 2024, 57(5): 42-51.
[15].赵明欣, 赵旭, 郎小尘. 钛合金表面超疏水膜的制备及其耐蚀性与机械稳定性[J]. 电镀与精饰, 2024, 46(2): 44-51.
[16].杨通晗, 朱晖朝, 李福球, 等. 周期数对Ti/TiN/Zr/ZrN多层膜耐摩擦和耐腐蚀性能的影响[J]. 电镀与涂饰, 2025, 44(3): 103-111.
[17].苏海, 张殿喜, 窦忠宇, 等. 镀钛对2195铝锂合金耐磨和腐蚀性能的影响[J]. 电镀与精饰, 2024, 46(5): 44-49.
[18].王昕阳, 刘谦, 任海滔, 等. 钛元素含量对CoCrFeNiTi高熵合金涂层硬度及耐磨性能的影响[J]. 表面技术, 2023, 52(1): 47-55.
[19].贺文健, 雷小玲, 丁文红. 基于Ga组织调控对钛/钢复合板界面结构及结合强度的影响[J]. 轧钢, 2024, 41(4): 36-43.
[20].曾祥勇, 许海仙, 朱家旭, 等. Ag-Cu-Ti系合金钎焊陶瓷覆铜基板界面结合强度研究进展[J]. 陶瓷学报, 2022, 43(4): 539-550.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙慧艳*,王兴雅,孙鹏飞.钛合金蓝色腐蚀检查工艺技术研究[J].电镀与精饰,2020,(1):36.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2020.01.008]
 SUN Huiyan*,WANG Xingya,SUN Pengfei.Research on the Blue Corrosion Inspection Technology of Titanium Alloy[J].Plating & Finishing,2020,(06):36.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2020.01.008]
[2]李 江,李 博*,刘小强,等.钛合金多孔零件内外表面一次镀铬工艺研究[J].电镀与精饰,2020,(7):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2020.07.0080]
 LI Jiang,LI Bo*,LIU Xiaoqiang,et al.Study on Chromium Plating Process of Porous Parts of Titanium Alloy[J].Plating & Finishing,2020,(06):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2020.07.0080]
[3]杨 堃*,张 明,孙小岚.TC2、TC6表面喷涂WC-17Co与电镀铬耐磨性能对比[J].电镀与精饰,2021,(10):26.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2021.10.005]
 YANG Kun*,ZHANG Ming,SUN Xiaolan.Wear Resistant Comparison of Spraying WC-17Co Coating and Chromium Plating on the Surface of TC2 and TC6[J].Plating & Finishing,2021,(06):26.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2021.10.005]
[4]詹中伟,葛玉麟,田礼熙*,等.搅拌速度和颗粒尺寸对复合电沉积Ni-cBN复合量的影响及机理分析[J].电镀与精饰,2022,(1):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2022.01.001]
 ZHAN Zhongwei,GE Yulin TIAN Lixi*,WANG Shuaixing,et al.Effect of Stirring Speed and Particle Size on the Particle Content in the Ni-cBN Composite Plating and Its Mechanism[J].Plating & Finishing,2022,(06):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2022.01.001]
[5]赵明欣,赵 旭*,郎小尘.钛合金表面超疏水膜的制备及其耐蚀性与机械稳定性[J].电镀与精饰,2024,(2):44.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2024.02.007]
 Zhao Mingxin,Zhao Xu *,Lang Xiaochen.Preparation and corrosion resistance and mechanical stability of superhydrophobic film on titanium alloy[J].Plating & Finishing,2024,(06):44.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2024.02.007]
[6]李建普,卢旭东*,李冬冬.舰用钛合金及铬涂层抗氧化和腐蚀性能研究[J].电镀与精饰,2024,(5):65.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2024.05.010]
 Li Jianpu,Lu Xudong*,Li Dongdong.Research on oxidation resistance and corrosion resistance of marine titanium alloy and chromium coating[J].Plating & Finishing,2024,(06):65.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2024.05.010]
[7]收稿日期: 0-0-8 修回日期: 0-0-.钛合金脉冲电沉积 Cu-WC 复合镀层的硬度与摩擦磨损性能[J].电镀与精饰,2024,(11):58.
 Hardness and friction and wear property of Cu-WC composite coating on titanium alloy prepared by pulse electrodeposition Feng Xujia 1 Sun Hao 1* Gao Chenjing 2 Zhu Qingqin 1[J].Plating & Finishing,2024,(06):58.
[8]陈俊豪,刘 刚,王帅星,等.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2025.04.016添加剂对TA12钛合金化学铣切性能的影响[J].电镀与精饰,2025,(04):101.
 Chen Junhao,Liu Gang*,Wang Shuaixing,et al.Influence of additive on the chemical milling performance of TA12 titanium alloy[J].Plating & Finishing,2025,(06):101.
[9]李维荣,周宏标,王平右,等.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2025.05.016钛合金化学铣切加工中酸雾抑雾剂对化铣性能的影响[J].电镀与精饰,2025,(05):107.
 Cheng Fasong,Liu Gang,Wang Shuaixing*,et al.Influence of acid mist suppressants on the chemical milling performance of titanium alloy Li Weirong1, Zhou Hongbiao1, Wang Pingyou1, Yuan Ping1, Wang Tao1,[J].Plating & Finishing,2025,(06):107.
[10]范兴平*,范 维,魏 弦,等.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2025.10.006电压对Ti15-Mo合金液相等离子体[J].电镀与精饰,2025,(10):39.
 Fan Xingping*,Fan Wei,Wei Xian,et al.Effect of voltage on the carbon nitrogen co-diffusion film layer of Ti15-Mo alloy by liquid phase plasma electrolysis[J].Plating & Finishing,2025,(06):39.
[11]肖元昭,李 攀,路忠响,等.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3849.2026.06.010钛合金表面减摩耐磨复合膜层构筑及其结合强度增强机制[J].电镀与精饰,2026,(06):89.
 WANG Jianbang.Construction of anti-friction and wear-resistant composite film layers on titanium alloy surfaces and its mechanism for enhancing bonding strength[J].Plating & Finishing,2026,(06):89.

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-06-12